The methodology of selective quality control of rebar products
https://doi.org/10.37538/0005-9889-2025-1(626)-50-65
EDN: WPKKAT
Abstract
Introduction. The quality of rolled reinforcement is a key factor in the reliability of reinforced concrete structures in conditions of increasing number of floors and complexity of construction projects. Modern Russian standards (State Standard 34028-2016, State Standard R 52544-2006) require strict statistical control of the mechanical properties of rolled products, including temporary resistance, yield strength and relative elongation. The relevance of the study is due to the need to improve the accuracy of sampling methods in order to minimize the risks of an unreliable quality assessment.
Aim. Development of a methodology for selective quality control of rebar products based on statistical analysis, including verification of the normality of data distribution, elimination of outliers and assessment of compliance with the requirements of standards.
Materials and methods. The study is based on the analysis of test data for rebar rolled products of class A600 (State Standard 34028-2016). The Shapiro–Wilk, Pearson (χ2), and Kolmogorov–Smirnov criteria were applied to verify the normality of the distribution. Outliers were identified by the Charlier method (α = 0.05). Software tools were used to calculate statistical indicators (mean, RMSD, skewness, excess) and visualization (histograms, Q–Q graphs).
Results. It was found that the presence of outliers distorts the distribution of key parameters. For the ratio of temporary resistance to yield strength, the exclusion of emissions allowed the normality of the distribution to be restored (p > 0.05 according to two criteria), whereas for the relative elongation δmax, their effect turned out to be insignificant. Automated analysis has confirmed that the use of confidence intervals (95 %) and State Standard 34028-2016 methods increases the reliability of quality assessment.
Conclusions. Eliminating of outliers is a critical step to ensure the normality of data distribution. The combined use of agreement criteria increases the reliability of statistical conclusions. Automation of the methodology based on specialized software reduces the monitoring time and minimizes the human factor. Regular sampling is necessary to ensure that products meet the requirements of the standards and reduce risks in construction.
About the Authors
V. A. KharitonovRussian Federation
Veniamin A. Kharitonov, Cand. Sci. (Engineering), Professor of the Department of Materials Processing Technologies, Magnitogorsk State Technical University named after G.I. Nosov, Magnitogorsk
e-mail: hva-46@yandex.ru
tel.: +7 (351) 929-84-81
I. M. Petrov
Russian Federation
Igor M. Petrov, Cand. Sci. (Engineering), Associate Professor of the Department of Metallurgy and Standardization, Magnitogorsk State Technical University named after G.I. Nosov, branch in Beloretsk
e-mail: atrox.88@mail.ru
tel.: +7 (349) 724-00-59
S. V. Snimshchikov
Russian Federation
Sergey V. Snimshchikov, Cand. Sci. (Engineering), Vice-rector for E and APE, Moscow State Technical University of Civil Aviation, Moscow
e-mail: s.snimshikov@mstuca.ru
tel.: +7 (499) 459-04-90
M. Yu. Usanov
Russian Federation
Mikhail Yu. Usanov, Cand. Sci. (Engineering), Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Metallurgy and Standardization, Magnitogorsk State Technical University named after G.I. Nosov, branch in Beloretsk
e-mail: barracuda_m@mail.ru
tel.: +7 (349) 724-00-59
I. P. Savrasov
Russian Federation
Ivan P. Savrasov*, Cand. Sci. (Engineering), Assistant to the Vice-rector, Moscow State Technical University of Civil Aviation, Moscow
e-mail: i.savrasov@mstuca.ru
tel.: +7 (499) 452-47-60
D. O. Demin
Russian Federation
Dmitry O. Demin, Lecturer, Tikhonov Moscow Institute of Electronics and Mathematics, National Research University "Higher School of Economics", Moscow
e-mail: ddemin@hse.ru
References
1. Madatyan S.A. Reinforcement of reinforced concrete structures. Moscow: Publishing house of militarytechnical literature, 2000, 256 p. (In Russian).
2. Polyakova M.A., Kharitonov V.A., Snimshchikov S.V., Petrov I.M., Kharitonov V.A. Rolled rebar products: assortment, standardization, technology. Magnitogorsk: Nosov Magnitogorsk State Technical University Publ., 2022, 288 p. (In Russian).
3. SP 63.13330.2018. Concrete and reinforced concrete structures. General provisions. Updated version of SNiP 52-01-2003. Moscow: Standartinform Publ., 2019. (In Russian).
4. SP 430.1325800.2018. Monolithic structural systems. Design rules. Moscow: Standartinform Publ., 2019. (In Russian).
5. SP 14.13330.2018. Seismic building design code. Updated version of SNiP 11-7-81*. Moscow: Standartinform Publ., 2018. (In Russian).
6. Dorokhin P.S., Kharitonov V.A. Progress in the consumption structure of rolled rebar products with a diameter of up to 18 mm is inevitable. <i>Stroymetal</i>. 2012, no. 3, pp. 14–23. (In Russian).
7. Snimshchikov S.V., Kharitonov V.A., Surikov I.N., Anikeev V.V. A look into the future. <i>Stroymetal</i>. 2013, no. 5, pp. 7–13. (In Russian).
8. Kharitonov V.A., Petrov I.M. Assessment and ways for competitiveness increasing of coil reinforcing steel. <i>Vestnik of Nosov Magnitogorsk State Technical University</i>. 2013, no. 4, pp. 65–69. (In Russian).
9. Korshunov D.A. Aspects of reinforcement reliability. <i>Beton i Zhelezobeton = Concrete and Reinforced Concrete</i>. 2004, no. 1, pp. 27–31. (In Russian).
10. Belenky D.M., Vernesi N.L., Kosenko E.E. On the strength capabilities of reinforcing steel. <i>Beton i Zhelezobeton = Concrete and Reinforced Concrete</i>. 2004, no. 3, pp. 17–21. (In Russian).
11. Eurocode 2: Design of concrete structures – Part 1-1: General rules and rules for buildings.
12. Kharitonov V.A. Analysis of the quality level of rolled rebar products of class B500C based on mathematical statistics methods. <i>Ferrous metallurgy. Bulletin of scientific, technical and economic information</i>. 2013, no. 8, pp. 48–59. (In Russian).
13. Mikheeva E.N., Seroshtan M.V. Quality management. Moscow: Dashkov and Co., 2012, 532 p. (In Russian).
14. State Standard 34028-2016. Reinforcing rolled products for reinforced concrete constructions. Specifications. Moscow: Standartinform Publ., 2019. (In Russian).
15. State Standard R 52544-2006. Weldable deformed reinforcing rolled products of A500C and B500C classes for reinforcement of concrete constructions. Specifications. Moscow: Standartinform Publ., 2006. (In Russian).
16. State Standard 5781-82. Hot-rolled steel for reinforcement of ferroconcrete structures. Specifications. Moscow: Standartinform Publ., 2006. (In Russian).
17. Gmurman V.E. Probability theory and mathematical statistics. Moscow: Higher school, 2003, 479 p. (In Russian).
18. Rumyantsev M.I., Levandovsky S.A., Ruchinskaya N.A., Cherkasov K.E., Loginov A.V. Statistical methods of processing and analyzing of the numerical information, quality control and management of rolled products. Magnitogorsk: Nosov Magnitogorsk State Technical University Publ., 2015, 259 p. (In Russian).
19. Lemeshko B.Yu., Lemeshko S.B. Comparative analysis of the criteria for checking the deviation of the distribution from the normal law. <i>Metrologiya</i>. 2005, no. 2, pp. 2–23. (In Russian).
20. Lemeshko B.Yu., Rogozhnikov A.P. On normality of errors in measurements in classical experiments and power of tests for deviation from the normal law. <i>Metrologiya</i>. 2012, no. 5, pp. 3–26. (In Russian).
21. State Standard R ISO 5479-2002. Statistical methods. Tests for departure of the probability distribution from the normal distribution. Moscow: Publishing house of standards, 2002. (In Russian).
22. ISO 5479:1997. Statistical interpretation of data – Tests for departure from the normal distribution.
23. Kobzar A.I. Applied mathematical statistics. Moscow: Physical and mathematical literature publishing house, 2006, 816 p. (In Russian).
24. R 50.1.033-2001. Applied statistics. Rules of check of experimental and theoretical distribution of the consent. Part I. Goodness-of-flt tests of a type chi-square. Moscow: Publishing house of standards, 2002. (In Russian).
25. R 50.1.037-2002. Applied statistics. Rules of check of experimental and theoretical distribution of the consent. Part II. Nonparametric goodness-of-fit test. Moscow: Publishing house of standards, 2002. (In Russian).
26.
Review
For citations:
Kharitonov V.A., Petrov I.M., Snimshchikov S.V., Usanov M.Yu., Savrasov I.P., Demin D.O. The methodology of selective quality control of rebar products. Concrete and Reinforced Concrete. 2025;626(1):50-65. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37538/0005-9889-2025-1(626)-50-65. EDN: WPKKAT