Behavior of the core-suspended building in case of local collapse of structural elements
https://doi.org/10.37538/0005-9889-2025-1(626)-5-18
EDN: EUFWNR
Abstract
Introduction. The core-suspended system was first used in the construction of high-rise buildings in the 1960s. This system was developed with the aim of rational use of urban space in conditions of dense buildings. It has become widespread around the world. In addition to their architectural advantages, core-suspended buildings have a number of important design features such as the increased flexibility of their load-bearing elements. This can be used to reduce the forces that occur in structures under various dynamic influences. At the same time, the construction and exploitation of buildings of the core-suspended type have technical difficulties. An emergency failure of critical load-bearing elements, such as suspensions or walls of the core of rigidity, in buildings of this type can lead to an avalanche-like collapse of other structures. Special attention should be paid to ensuring the resistance of trunk-suspended buildings to progressive collapse.
Aim. To analyze the susceptibility of a multi-storey suspended building to progressive collapse.
Materials and methods. In the LIRA software package, numerical modeling of a building with a core-suspended load-bearing system was carried out when the accidental failure of most critical load-bearing elements was occured. This allowed an analysis of the building's resistance to progressive collapse.
Results. Data on the stress-strain state of load-bearing elements during local structural failure have been obtained.
Conclusions. The core-suspended building is not susceptible to progressive collapse. This is confirmed by data on the behavior of the building in calculations corresponding to various local structural failures.
About the Authors
T. A. Belash
JSC Research Center of Construction
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Tatyana A. Belash, Dr. Sci. (Engineering), Professor of the Department of Building Structures, Structures and Materials, JSC Research Center of Construction, Moscow
e-mail: belashta@mail.ru
I. V. Svitlik
Saint Petersburg State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Ilia V. Svitlik*, Postgraduate Student, Department of Metal and Timber Constructions, Saint Petersburg State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Saint Petersburg
e-mail: svitlik.i@yandex.ru
tel.: +7 (952) 667-41-88
References
1. Maklakova T.G. High-rise buildings. Urban planning and architectural design problems. 2nd ed. Moscow: ASV Publ., 2008, 160 p. (In Russian).
2. Buzalo N.A., Ponomarev R.R. Shroud anchoring units in the shroud coverings of sports facilities. <i>Actual problems of science and technology: Proceedings of the All-Russian (National) Scientific and Practical Conference</i>. Rostov-on-Don, 2023, pp. 554–556. (In Russian).
3. Buzalo N.A., Ponomarev R.R., Smirnov V.A. Modeling of units of cable-stayed coverings of sports facilities. <i>Zhilishchnoe Stroitel’stvo = Housing Construction</i>. 2023, no. 6, pp. 9–12. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.31659/0044-4472-2023-6-9-12
4. Buzalo N.A., Platonova I.D. Calculation of a hanging system based on a finite element model. <i>News of higher educational institutions. The North Caucasus region. Technical sciences</i>. 2003, no. 3, pp. 51–53. (In Russian).
5. Ahmed A.R., Yermoshin N.A. Optimum design of cable-stayed bridges considering cable loss scenarios. <i>Asian journal of civil engineering</i>. 2024, no. 3, pp. 2801–2809.
6. Belash T.A., Svitlik I.V. On the issue of improving the seismic resistance of suspended buildings in areas of high seismic activity. <i>Seismostoikoe Stroitel`stvo. Bezopasnost` sooruzhenii = Earthquake engineering. Constructions safety</i>. 2023, no. 2, pp. 54–66. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.37153/2618-9283-2023-1-54-66
7. Uzdin A.M., Sandovich T.A., Al-Nasser Mohomad Samih Amin. Fundamentals of the theory of earthquake resistance and earthquake engineering. Saint Petersburg: Vedeneev VNIIG, 1993, 175 p. (In Russian).
8. Baynatov Zh.B., Podolsky D.M. Suspended highrise building. Patent No. 1357529 USSR, IPC E04H 9/02 (2006.01), E04B 1/34 (2006.01). No. 3996924. Publ. date 07.12.1987. (In Russian).
9. Penkovsky G.F., Sevastyanov V.V., Yershov A.V. Earthquake-resistant building with suspended floors. Patent No. 175448 Russian Federation, IPC E04H 9/02 (2006.01). No. 2017125171. Publ. date 05.12.2017. (In Russian).
10. Chanukvadze G.Sh., Marjanishvili M.A., Mikabadze Yu.G. Multi-storey earthquake-resistant building with suspended floors. USSR Patent No. 791871, IPC E04H 9/02 (2006.01), E04B 1/34 (2006.01). No. 2758567. Publ. date 30.12.1980. (In Russian).
11. SP 385.1325800.2018. Protection of buildings and structures against progressive collapse. Design code. Basic statements. Moscow: Standartinform Publ., 2018. (In Russian).
12. Software package LIRA 10.12. User's Guide. PC LIRA 10.12 URL: https://lira-soft.com/upload/iblock/7b9/an6bai2i3shhypwx4gdz9f0lly5daoqv/Rukovodstvo_pol_zovatelya_LIRA_10.12.pdf (accessed: 23 January 2025). (In Russian).
13. SP 63.13330.2018. Concrete and reinforced concrete structures. General provisions. Updated version of SNiP 52-01-2003. Moscow, 2018. (In Russian).
Review
For citations:
Belash T.A., Svitlik I.V. Behavior of the core-suspended building in case of local collapse of structural elements. Concrete and Reinforced Concrete. 2025;626(1):5-18. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37538/0005-9889-2025-1(626)-5-18. EDN: EUFWNR
Views:
147
Email this article 