Features of the application of combined steel-reinforced concrete floors based on lightweight steel thin-walled structures in seismic-prone regions

Introduction. The article is devoted to the study of the features of the use of combined steel-reinforced concrete floors made on the basis of lightweight steel thin-walled structures in the construction of buildings in seismic areas. These structures are lightweight, have a high load-bearing capacity relative to their own weight and accelerate the construction process. Together, these properties make them a competitive alternative to traditional technologies used in the construction of buildings erected in seismic areas.

The aim of the study is to review, demonstrate the current progress, problems and future directions of research, features of the use of combined steel-reinforced concrete floors of buildings based on lightweight steel thin-walled structures in seismic areas.

Materials and methods. A systematic review and analysis of domestic and international studies on the seismic resistance of composite steel-reinforced concrete floors based on lightweight steel thin-walled structures were conducted. The study used systematization, structural, comparative, and correlational analyses, as well as theoretical generalization of materials obtained from normative and technical documents and research literature regarding the seismic performance of these floors.

Results. The findings of experimental studies on the seismic resistance of composite steel-reinforced concrete floors based on lightweight steel thin-walled structures were reviewed and summarized. Current achievements, pressing challenges, and future research directions were demonstrated. The analysis confirms that these floors offer a competitive and effective solution for construction of buildings being erected in regions prone to seismic activity. The synergy between the steel frame, profiled decking, and concrete layer ensures an optimal balance of stiffness and ductility, which is critical for resisting seismic loads and ensuring structural reliability and mechanical safety. However, the lack of normative documents regulating the design of such floors in seismic regions hinders their broader adoption in construction practices.

Conclusions. The study confirms the necessity for theoretical and experimental research, as well as the development and refinement of normative and technical documents. These efforts will facilitate the wider application of composite steel-reinforced concrete floors based on lightweight steel thin-walled structures, ensuring the reliability and mechanical safety of buildings constructed with their use, particularly in regions prone to seismic activity.

1. Belyaeva S.Yu., Prisyazhnyuk N.V., Davidenko A.I. On the Improvement of the Methodology for Calculating the Strength of Reinforced Concrete Flexural Elements Reinforced with Steel Profiled Decking. <i>Construction Structures: Interdepartmental Scientific and Technical Collection of Research Papers</i>. Kyiv: NNISK, 2004, issue 60, pp. 542–546. (In Russian).

2. Recommendations for the design of monolithic reinforced concrete floors with steel profiled decking / NIIZHB, TsNIIPromizdany. Moscow: Stroyizdat Publ., 1987, 40 p. (In Russian).

3. Davidenko A.I., Davidenko M.A., Belyaeva S.Yu., Prisyazhnyuk N.V. Tubular-Ribbed Reinforced Concrete Slab with Steel Profiled Decking: Design Solution and Strength Calculation. <i>Modern Building Structures Made of Metal and Wood: Collection of Scientific Papers</i>. Odessa, 2005, Part 1, pp. 62–67. (In Russian).

4. Boyarsky A.V., Eliseev Yu.I. New Effective Profiled Decking for Reinforcement of Composite Slabs. <i>Building Materials and Technologies</i>. 2007, issue 24, pp. 9–12. (In Russian).

5. Davidenko A.I., Davidenko M.A., Prisyazhnyuk N.V., Raitarovsky A.N., Mazur S.E., Belov I.D. Patent 9769 E 01 B 5/40. Tubular-Ribbed Flooring Structure with Steel Profiled Decking. DonSTU. Application No. 200503027. Filed April 4, 2005. Published October 17, 2005. Bulletin No. 10. (In Russian).

6. Belyaeva S.Yu. Strength Calculation of Monolithic Reinforced Concrete Slabs with Double Profiled Decking. <i>Construction Structures: Interdepartmental Scientific and Technical Collection of Research Papers</i>. Kyiv: NIISK, 2005, issue 63, pp. 37–42. (In Russian).

7. SP 260.1325800.2016. Cold-formed thin-walled steel profile and galvanized corrugated plate constructions. Design rules. Moscow: Standardinform Publ., 2016. (In Russian).

8. SP 14.13330.2018. Seismic building design code. Updated version of SNiP II-7-81*. Moscow: Standardinform Publ., 2018. (In Russian).

9. AISI S400-15 North American Standard for Seismic Design of Cold-Formed Steel Structural Systems. Washington, DC, USA: American Iron and Steel Institute (AISI), 2015.

10. NBCC. National Building Code of Canada. Ottawa, ON, Canada: National Research Council of Canada (NRCC), 2005.

11. Schafer B.W., Ayhan D., Leng J., Liu P., Padilla-Llano D., Peterman K.D., Stehman M., Buonopane S.G., Eatherton M., Madsen R., et al. Seismic response and engineering of cold-formed steel framed buildings. <i>Structures</i>. 2016, no. 8, pp. 197–212.

12. Buonopane S.G, Bian G., Tun T.H., Schafer B.W. Computationally Efficient Fastener-Based Models of Cold-Formed Steel Shear Walls with Wood Sheathing. <i>Journal of Constructional Steel Research</i>. 2015, vol. 110, pp. 137–148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2015.03.008

13. Ayhan D., Schafer B.W. Cold-formed steel member bending stiffness prediction. <i>Journal of Constructional Steel Research</i>. 2015, vol. 115, pp. 148–159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2015.07.004

14. Liu O., Peterman K.D., Yu C., Schafer B.W. Impact of construction details on OSB-sheathed cold-formed steel framed shear walls. <i>Journal of Constructional Steel Research</i>. 2014, vol. 101, pp. 114–123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2014.05.003

15. Ayhan D., Qin Y., Torabian S., Schafer B.W. Characterizing joist-ledger performance for coldformed steel light frame construction. <i>Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Advances in Steel Structures</i>. Lisbon, Portugal, July 22–24. 2015, 15 p.

16. Schafer B.W. Seismic response and engineering of cold-formed steel framed buildings. <i>Proceedings of the Eight International Conference on Advances in Steel Structures</i>. Lisbon, Portugal, July 22–24. 2015, 22 p.

17. Peterman K.D., Schafer B.W. Experimental determination of base shear from full-scale shake table testing of two cold-formed steel framed buildings. <i>Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Behavior of Steel Structures in Seismic Areas – STESSA 2015</i>. Shanghai, China, July 1–4. 2015.

18. Bian G., Padilla-Llano D.A., Leng J., Buonopane S.G., Moen C.D., Schafer B.W. OpenSEES modeling of cold formed steel framed wall system. <i>Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Behavior of Steel Structures in Seismic Areas – STESSA 2015</i>. Shanghai, China, July 1–4. 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.23911.65441

19. Swensen S., Deierlein G.G., Miranda E. Behavior of screw and adhesive connections to gypsum wallboard in wood and cold-formed steel-framed wallettes. <i>Journal of Structural Engineering</i>. 2016, vol. 142, issue 4, E4015002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001307

20. Ye J., Wang X., Zhao M. Experimental study on shear behavior of screw connections in CFS sheathing. <i>Journal of Constructional Steel Research</i>. 2016, vol. 121, pp. 1–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2015.12.027

21. Fiorino L., Macillo V., Landolfo R. Experimental characterization of quick mechanical connecting systems for cold-formed steel structures. <i>Advances in Structural Engineering</i>. 2017, vol. 20, issue 7, pp. 1098–1110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1369433216671318

22. Fiorino L., Pali T., Bucciero B., Macillo V., Terracciano M.T., Landolfo R. Experimental study on screwed connections for sheathed CFS structures with gypsum or cement based panels. <i>Thin-Walled Structures</i>. 2017, vol. 116, pp. 234–249. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2017.03.031

23. Jenkins C., Soroushian S., Rahmanishamsi E., Maragakis E.M. Experimental fragility analysis of cold-formed steel-framed partition wall systems. <i>Thin-Walled Structures</i>. 2016, vol. 103, pp. 115–127.

24. Wang X., Pantoli E., Hutchinson T.C., Restrepo J.I., Wood R.L., Hoehler M.S., Grzesik P., Sesma F.H. Seismic performance of cold-formed steel wall systems in a full-scale building. <i>Journal of Structural Engineering</i>. 2015, vol. 141, no. 10, 04015014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001245

25. Magliulo G., Petrone C., Capozzi V., et al. Seismic performance evaluation of plasterboard partitions via shake table tests. <i>Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering</i>. 2014, vol. 12, pp. 1657–1677. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-013-9567-8

26. Bubis A.A., Gizyatullin I.R., Dottuev A.I., Nazmeeva T.V. Seismic resistance of frame-cladding buildings with a cold-formed galvanized steel profile framing. <i>Vestnik NIC Stroitel`stvo = Bulletin of Science and Research Center of Construction</i>. 2021, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 98–109. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.37538/2224-9494-2021-4(31)-98-109

27. Giziatullin I.R. Experimental study on seismic performance of cold-formed steel shear walls. <i>Scientific Potential of the Construction Industry:</i> Proceedings of the II Scientific and Practical Conference, September 22, 2021. Moscow: JSC Research Center of Construction Publ., 2021, pp. 13–17. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.37538/2713-1157-2021-13-17

28. Giziatullin I.R. Seismic resistance of frame-cladding buildings having cold-formed galvanized steel construction: review and analysis of current status. <i>Vestnik NIC Stroitel`stvo = Bulletin of Science and Research Center of Construction</i>. 2022, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 30–52. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.37538/2224-9494-2022-1(32)-30-52

29. Giziatullin I.R. Seismic resistance of frame-cladding buildings having cold-formed galvanized steel construction. <i>Bulletin of the International Association of Experts on Seismic-Resistant Construction</i>. 2022, no. 1 (13), 19–49. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.38054/iaeee-202203

30. Nikolaidou V., Latreille P., Rogers C.A., Lignos D.G. Characterization of cold-formed steel framed/woodsheathed floor and roof diaphragm structures. <i>Proceedings of the 16thWorld Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 16WCEE</i>. Santiago, Chile, 9–13 January 2017. 2017, p. 452.

31. Baldassino N., Bernardi M., Zandonini R., Zordan M. Study of cold-formed steel floor systems under shear loadings. <i>Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Thin-Walled Structures (ICTWS 2018)</i>. Lisbon, Portugal, 24–27 July 2018.

32. Fiorino L., Macillo V., Landolfo R. Shake table tests of a full-scale two-story sheathing-braced coldformed steel building. <i>Engineering Structures</i>. 2017, vol. 151, pp. 633–647. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.08.056

33. Campiche A. Numerical modelling of CFS three-story strap-braced building under shaking-table excitations. <i>Materials</i>. 2021, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14010118