To assign the length of overlapping joints of compressed reinforcement in one design section of reinforced concrete elements
https://doi.org/10.37538/0005-9889-2024-4(623)-18-28
EDN: YINKOU
Abstract
Introduction. Overlapping reinforcement joints in monolithic reinforced concrete structures are the most common, because they have sufficient simplicity and low labor intensity when installed on a construction site. When designing such joints in structures subject to compressive load, questions often arise related to the need to arrange an increased overlap length of compressed reinforcement in accordance with the requirements of domestic regulatory documents.
Aim. The aim of the work is an analysis of modern design practice, as well as available experimental studies of the bearing capacity of compressed reinforced concrete elements with overlapping reinforcement joints located in the same design section.
Materials and methods. The analysis was carried out by studying the provisions of domestic and foreign regulatory and technical documentation, as well as the results of experimental studies available in the public domain.
Results. The data on the methods available in the design practice for determining the overlap length of compressed reinforcement are systematized, including the case, when the joints are located in the same design section.
Conclusions. Based on the results of the work, the existing approaches for assigning the length of the overlap of compressed reinforcement located in the same design section of reinforced concrete structures were analyzed. The methods adopted in Russian and foreign regulatory and technical documents, as well as experimental research on this topic, are considered. Based on the results of the analysis of the available data, it can be said that additional studies to assess the effect of the overlap length of the compressed reinforcement on the strength of reinforced concrete elements can optimize their design solutions – without reducing the required level of reliability.
Supporting agencies: The study was carried out within the framework of contractual works of JSC Research Center of Construction and Federal Autonomous Institution “Federal Center for Regulation, Standardization and Technical Assessment in Construction” (FAU “FCC”).
About the Authors
S. A. Zenin
Research Institute of Concrete and Reinforced Concrete named after A.A. Gvozdev, JSC Research Center of Construction
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Sergey A. Zenin*, Cand. Sci. (Engineering), Head of the Laboratory of the Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Constructive Systems, Research Institute of Concrete and Reinforced Concrete named after A.A. Gvozdev, JSC Research Center of Construction, Moscow
e-mail: lab01@mail.ru
K. D. Sychev
JSC Research Center of Construction; LLC APEX Design Bureau
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Konstantin D. Sychev, Graduate Student, JSC Research
Center of Construction; Chief Design Specialist, LLC APEX Design Bureau, Moscow
References
1. SP 63.13330.2018. Concrete and reinforced concrete structures. General provisions. SNiP 52-01-2003. (In Russian).
2. Gvozdev A.A. et al. New in the design of concrete and reinforced concrete structures. Moscow: Stroyizdat Publ., 1978, 208 p. (In Russian).
3. SP 35.13330.2011. Bridges and culverts. Updated version of SNiP 2.05.03-84*. (In Russian).
4. SP 41.13330.2012. Concrete and reinforced concrete hydraulic structures. Updated version of SNiP 2.06.08-87. (In Russian).
5. SP 14.13330.2018. Seismic building design code. Updated version of SNiP II-7-81*. (In Russian).
6. EN 1992-1-1:2004. Eurocode 2: Design of concrete structures – Part 1-1: General rules and rules for buildings.
7. CEB-FIB Model Code 1990.
8. <i>fib</i> Model Code for Concrete Structure 2010.
9. <i>fib</i> Bulletin 72. Bond and anchorage of embedded reinforcement: Background to the <i>fib</i> Model Code for Concrete Structures 2010.
10. Cairns J. Bond Strength Of Compression Splices: A Re-evaluation Of Test Data. <i>Proceedings American Concrete Institute,</i> July – August 1985, pp. 510–516.
11. DIN 1045-1:2008-08. Tragwerke aus Beton, Stahlbeton und Spannbeton – Teil 1: Bemessung und Konstruktion.
12. ACI 318-19. Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete.
13. Kritsman Yu.L. Columns with blocked reinforcement. <i>Beton i Zhelezobeton = Concrete and Reinforced Concrete.</i> 1981, no. 4, pp. 29–30. (In Russian).
14. Artemyev V.P., Yerkinbekov A., Evgeniev I.E. Investigation of off-center compressed elements with a group arrangement of longitudinal reinforcement. <i>Beton i Zhelezobeton = Concrete and Reinforced Concrete</i>. 1976, no. 6, pp. 32–34. (In Russian).
15. Cairns J. The Strength of lapped joints in reinforced concrete columns / PhD thesis / The University of Glasgow, 1976, 212 р.
16. Pfister J.F., Mattock A.H. High Strength Bars as Concrete Reinforcement, Part 5: Lapped Splices in Concentrically Loaded Columns. <i>Journal of the PCA Research and Development Laboratories</i>. 1963, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 27–40.
17. Sung-Chul Chun, Sung-Ho Lee, Bohwan Oh. Simplified Design Equation of Lap Splice Length in Compression. <i>International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials.</i> 2010, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 63–68. DOI: 10.4334/IJCSM.2010.4.1.063
18. Sung-Chul Chun, Sung-Ho Lee, Bohwan Oh. Compression Lap Splice Length in Concrete of Compressive Strength from 40 to 70 MPa. <i>Journal of the Korea Concrete Institute</i>. 2009, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 401–408. (In Korean).
19. prEN 1992-1-1:2018. Eurocode 2: Design of concrete structures – Part 1-1: General rules, rules for buildings, bridges and civil engineering structures.
Review
For citations:
Zenin S.A., Sychev K.D. To assign the length of overlapping joints of compressed reinforcement in one design section of reinforced concrete elements. Concrete and Reinforced Concrete. 2024;623(4):18-28. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37538/0005-9889-2024-4(623)-18-28. EDN: YINKOU
Views:
154
Email this article 