Comparison of the estimated crack opening width at an early stage of concrete hardening

Introduction. The calculation of the crack opening width is one of the requirements for the operational reliability of reinforced concrete structures. Cracks in reinforced concrete elements occur both under operating loads and during the initial period of strength gain due to the low tensile strength of concrete and the nature of its operation in general. The increasing speed of construction requires taking into account the thermally stressed state of not only massive, but also conventional structures at an early age of concrete, including calculating the crack opening width at the strength gain stage to ensure the design and operational characteristics of structures and assess the possibility of the loading of the structures whose concrete has not yet reached its operational characteristics.

Aim. The study is aimed at analyzing the need to take into account the features of concrete at an early age (the ratio of strength and modulus of deformation differs from the design age) when calculating the crack opening width.

Materials and methods. The paper analyzes the calculation methods laid down in the regulatory documents. Calculations of crack opening widths for reinforced concrete sections with different percentages of reinforcement have been performed. A comparison of the calculation methods and the obtained values of the crack opening width according to various regulatory documents for concrete in the early stages of hardening was performed, as well as an assessment of the effect of changes in the modulus of elasticity on the cracking process. The analysis was performed taking into account both the standard modulus of elasticity of concrete (28 days) and its reduced value on day 7. Experimental research data was used to verify the results.

Results. It was found that a decrease in the modulus of elasticity of concrete in the early stages of hardening (up to 24 %) leads to an increase in the estimated crack width (up to 11 %) with identical strength.

Conclusions. The results of the study emphasize the need to take into account the changes in the modulus of elasticity of concrete in the early stages of hardening when designing the structures. This will make it possible to more accurately predict the crack opening width, including temperature and shrinkage, and will increase the reliability of reinforced concrete structures during operation.

1. Loleit A.F. Course of theory of reinforced concrete design for construction technical schools, fundamentals of theory and design. Moscow–Leningrad: State Publishing House, 1925, 262 p. (In Russian).

2. Murashev V.I. Crack resistance, rigidity and strength of reinforced concrete. Moscow: Publishing House of the Ministry of Construction of the Mechanical Engineering Enterprises, 1950, 268 p. (In Russian).

3. SP 63.13330.2018. Concrete and reinforced concrete structures. General provisions. Updated version of SNiP 52-01-2003 (with Changes No. 1, 2). Moscow, 2018. (In Russian).

4. Saliger R. High grade steel in reinforcement concrete. 2nd Congress, International Association for Bridges and Structural Engineering, Preliminary Publication, Berlin-Munich, 1936, pp. 293–315.

5. Tomas F.G. Cracking in reinforced concrete. <i>Structural Engineer</i>. 1936, no. 7, vol. 14, pp. 298–320.

6. Broms B.B. Crack width and crack spacing in reinforced concrete members. <i>Journal of American Concrete Institute.</i> 1965, no. 10, vol. 62, pp. 1237–1256.

7. Mr Bayes, Mr Price. An Essay towards Solving a Problem in the Doctrine of Chances. By the Late Rev. Mr. Bayes, F. R. S. Communicated by Mr. Price, in a Letter to John Canton, A. M. F. R. S. <i>Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London</i>. 1763, vol. 53, pp. 370–418. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstl.1763.0053.

8. Base G.D., J.B. Read, Beeby A.W., Taylor H.P.J. An Investigation of the Crack Control Characteristics of Various Types of Bar in Reinforced Concrete Beams. Research Report No. 18, Parts I and II, Cement and Concrete Association, London, 1966.

9. EN 1992-1-1:2004. Eurocode 2: Design of concrete structures – Part 1-1: General rules and rules for buildings.

10. Gergely P., Lutz L.A. Maximum Crack Width in RC Flexural Members, Causes, Mechanism and Control of Cracking in Concrete. SP-20, American Concrete Institute, Detroit, 1968, pp. 87–117.

11. Building Code Requirements for Reinforced Concrete (ACI 318-95) and Commentary (ACI 318R-95). American Concrete Institute, Detroit, 1995.

12. Building Code Requirements for Reinforced Concrete (ACI 318-08) and Commentary (ACI 318R-08). American Concrete Institute, Detroit, 2008.

13. Concrete sanitary engineering structures, a report by ACI committee 350. ACI Structural Journal. 1983, vol. 80, pp. 467–486.

14. Building Code Requirements for Reinforced Concrete (ACI 318-05) and Commentary (ACI 318R-05). American Concrete Institute, Detroit, 2005.

15. BS 8110-2:1985. Structural use of concrete – Part 2: Code of practice for special circumstances. 1997, British Standard Institution, London, 1998.

16. Jin-Keun Kim, Sang Hun Han, Young Chul Song. Effect of temperature and aging on the mechanical properties of concrete: Part I. Experimental results. <i>Cement and Concrete Research</i>. 2002, vol. 32, no. 7, pp. 1087–1094. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(02)00744-5.

17. Trapeznikov L.P. Thermal crack resistance of massive concrete structures. Moscow: Energoatomizdat Publ., 1986, 270 p. (In Russian).