To justification of concrete strength criterion at biaxial compression
https://doi.org/10.37538/0005-9889-2024-3(622)-13-19
Abstract
Introduction. Numerous experimental data from Russian and foreign researchers indicate that the classical plasticity hypotheses do not take into account the different resistance to uniaxial tension and compression, the influence of the spherical tensor. At the same time, experiments show that the ultimate resistance depends on the type of stress state, and hydrostatic pressure increases the strength and plasticity of solids.
Aim. To establish the dependence of the influence of the second component of stresses during biaxial compression of concrete on the parameters of the complete diagrams of deformation of the material σbR and εbR it is necessary to describe these diagrams, and to construct a closed curve on the plane of the main stresses (concrete strength criterion).
Materials and methods. Based on the experimental materials of foreign and domestic researchers, including the experiments of the authors of the article, methods of mechanics of deformed solids, limit curves and a closed curve on the plane of the main stresses in the form of a chain line forming the smallest area strength surface in the form of a catenoid are proposed.
Results. The article provides an analysis of the known strength criteria from the point of view of their geometric interpretation in the stress space. It is shown that these studies relate mainly to metals and metal structures, and for the design of reinforced concrete and steel-concrete structures in a complex stress state, it is necessary to develop an appropriate criterion for the strength of concrete.
Conclusions. As a result, the proposed limit curves and the surface (material strength criterion) on the plane of main stresses in the form of a catenoid accurately reflect the behavior of concrete under conditions of uniform and uneven flat stress state, and the equation of the surface in the form of a catenoid is a generalization of the equations of limit curves for each of the three types of flat stress state. At the same time, there is no overestimation of strength in the "compression – compression" area in this case.
About the Authors
A. A. Davidenko
Research Institute of Building Constructions named after V.A. Koucherenko, JSC Research Center of Construction
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Alexei A. Davidenko*, Cand. Sci. (Engineering), Senior Researcher, Laboratory of Earthquake-Resistant Structures and Innovative Methods of Seismic Protection, EERC Research Institute of Building Constructions named after V.A. Koucherenko, JSC Research Center of Construction, Moscow
e-mail: alikdave88@yandex.ru
A. I. Davidenko
FSBEI HE Lugansk State Agrarian University named after K.E. Voroshilov
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Alexander I. Davidenko, Dr. Sci. (Engineering), Professor of the Department of Design of Agricultural Facilities, Lugansk State Agrarian University named after K.E. Voroshilov, Lugansk
References
1. Bell J.F. Experimental Foundations of Mechanics of Deformable Solids: In 2 parts. Part 1. Small Deformations / Translated from English; edited by A.P. Filin. Moscow: Nauka, 1984, 600 p. (In Russian).
2. Mechanical Properties of Structural Materials under Complex Stress State: Handbook / A.A. Lebedev, B.I. Kovalchuk, F.F. Giginyak, V.P. Lamashevsky. Kiev: Nauk. Dumka, 1983, 336 p. (In Russian).
3. Ratner S.I. Strength and Plasticity of Metals. Moscow: Oborongiz, 1949, 152 p. (In Russian).
4. Lebedev A.A. Strength Calculations under Complex Stress State. Kyiv: Ministry of Higher and Secondary Special Education of the Ukrainian SSR, 1968, 66 p. (In Russian).
5. Aibinder S.B., Tyunina E.L., Tsirule K.I. Properties of polymers under various stress states. Moscow: Chemistry, 1981, 232 p. (In Russian).
6. Bridgman P.V. Study of large plastic deformations and rupture. Moscow: Publishing house of foreign literature, 1955, 444 p. (In Russian).
7. Plasticity and strength of solids under high pressures / Beresnev B.I., Martynov E.D., Rodionov K.P., etc. Moscow: Nauka, 1970, 161 p. (In Russian).
8. Filin A.P. Applied mechanics of a solid deformable body: T. 1. Strength of materials with elements of the theory of continuous media and structural mechanics. Moscow: Nauka, 1975, 832 p. (In Russian).
9. Korsun V., Niedoriezov A., Makarenko S. Comparative analysis of the strength criteria for concrete. <i>Modern industrial and civil construction</i>. 2014, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 65–78. (In Russian).
10. Gvozdev A.A., Bich P.M. Strength of concrete under biaxial stress state. <i>Beton i Zhelezobeton = Concrete and Reinforced Concrete.</i> 1974, no. 7, pp. 10–11. (In Russian).
11. Lebedev A.A. Development of strength theories in fracture mechanics. <i>Problemy prochnosti.</i> 2010, no. 5, pp. 127–146. (In Russian).
12. Balan T.A. Determination of the ratio for structurally inhomogeneous materials in a complex stress state. <i>Problemy prochnosti.</i> 1985, no. 12, pp. 106–115. (In Russian).
13. Geniev G.A., Kisyuk V.N., Tyupin G.A. Theory of plasticity of concrete and reinforced concrete. Moscow: Stroyizdat Publ., 1974, 316 p. (In Russian).
14. Verigin K.P. Resistance of concrete to destruction under uniaxial and biaxial compression. In the book: Structure, strength and deformation of concrete. Moscow: Stroyizdat Publ., 1966, pp. 234–237. (In Russian).
15. Yashin A.V. Strength and deformation criteria for concrete under simple loading for various types of stress state. <i>Proceedings of the NIIZHB Institute</i>. 1977, issue 39, pp. 48–57. (In Russian).
16. Kulik I.I. Strength, deformation and calculation of reinforced concrete structures under plane stress state [dissertation]. Vilnius, 1982, 20 p. (In Russian).
17. Kupfer H., Hilsdorf H.K., Rusch H. Behavior of Concrete under Biaxial Stresses. <i>ACI Journal Proceedings</i>. 1969, vol. 66, issue 8, pp. 656–666.
18. Bich P.M. Studies of strength, deformability, and microfractures of heavy and light concretes under plane stress [dissertation]. Moscow, 1973, 12 p. (In Russian).
19. Bambura A.N., Davidenko A.I. Experimental studies of the patterns of concrete deformation under biaxial compression. <i>Building structures</i>. 1989, issue 42, pp. 95–100. (In Russian).
20. Svetlitsky V.A. Mechanics of flexible rods and threads. Moscow: Mechanical Engineering, 1978, 222 p. (In Russian).
Review
For citations:
Davidenko A.A., Davidenko A.I. To justification of concrete strength criterion at biaxial compression. Concrete and Reinforced Concrete. 2024;622(3):13-19. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37538/0005-9889-2024-3(622)-13-19
Views:
139
Email this article 